SHC acquits man in university student's 2017 suicide case

HYDERABAD: The Sindh High Court (SHC) on Monday acquitted a man who was handed a life https://www.dawn.com/news/1734451">sentence three years ago in connection with a 2017 https://www.dawn.com/news/1306787">suicide case of a university student.

The body of Naila Rind was https://www.dawn.com/news/1306392">found hanging from the ceiling fan of her room in Sindh University’s Marvi Hostel in Jamshoro on Jan 1, 2017.

She was a final-year student of the Sindhi department.

Days later, police https://www.dawn.com/news/1306787">arrested Anees Khaskheli, a private school teacher, based on data retrieved from Naila’s mobile phone, which showed frequent communication between them.

In January 2023, an anti-terrorism court (ATC) had https://www.dawn.com/news/1734451">sentenced Anees under Section 7-A (acts of terrorism) of the https://nacta.gov.pk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Anti-Terrorism-Act-1997.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, read with Section 321 [Qatl-bis-sabab (causing death to a person unintentionally)] of the https://www.fmu.gov.pk/docs/laws/Pakistan%20Penal%20Code.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Pakistan Penal Code (PPC).

He was also found guilty of committing offences under Sections 21(b) and (c) (cyberstalking) of the https://www.na.gov.pk/uploads/documents/1470910659_707.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (Peca) 2016.

The same year, Anees challenged his conviction before the SHC. On Monday, a two-member bench comprising Justices Omar Sial and Mohammad Abdur Rahman issued a written verdict for the hearing held on April 18.

In the judgment, a copy of which is available with Dawn, the bench noted that an offence under the ATA had not been proven.

“No dissemination or public display of photos was proved.

Blackmail was not proved,” it stated.

The court further said that no “unlawful act” on Anees’s part was proven, and that the prosecution “failed to prove its case beyond [a] reasonable doubt”.

Advocates Waqar Siyal, Zeeshan and Muhammad Faheem represented Anees, while Additional Prosecutor General Nazar Memon argued on behalf of the complainant, Naila’s brother Nisar Ahmed, who did not wish to engage a private counsel.

In the verdict, the bench noted that the investigation officer (IO) had produced photocopies of documents upon which the prosecution relied, stressing that trial courts must give reasons for admitting secondary evidence.

More to follow