Apple could win the AI race without running

Axios Axios

Apple isn't burning mountains of cash to buy GPUs for the sake of training AI models and processing prompts.

  • Nor is it investing huge sums in frontier labs like OpenAI or Anthropic, as are rivals like Amazon and Microsoft.

Why it matters: Apple may reap the rewards of everyone else's spend.

Success from the sidelines.


Apple's playbook: Keep selling high-end consumer hardware that will become even more essential as AI becomes more ubiquitous.

  • AI advancements could lead to shorter upgrade cycles, while Apple's reputation for enhanced privacy could become an enhanced selling point.
  • All the while, "taxing" the frontier labs via the App Store.

    It doesn't matter to Apple which app gets used most, so long as it's being used.

Behind the scenes: This is an argument that more and more investors, including some VCs with big AI positions, have been whispering about.

Zoom in: OK, it's not a sure bet.

Wildcard: It's possible that the our primary AI devices won't be mobile.

They'll be something else, running agents.

What's in our pocket will be used more like the original iPhone — talk, text, and listen to music.

  • In this case, Apple remains likely to benefit.

    As Axios' Ina Fried notes: "Lots of people are coding on their Macs and the Mac mini is sold out as enthusiasts use them to run agents like OpenClaw."

The bottom line: Apple's Tim Cook seems to be echoing the wisdom of Joshua, a rogue AI from the 1983 film War Games: "Strange game. The only winning move is not to play."

Read full article at Axios →