- 'Breakthrough' Alzheimer's drugs unlikely to benefit patients, report suggests BBC News —
- Much-hyped Alzheimer’s drugs do not help patients, review finds The Straits Times —
- Alzheimer’s drugs targeting amyloid don’t help, review finds The Japan Times —
- Alzheimer’s drugs ‘make no meaningful difference to patients,’ major review suggests The Independent —
- Effect of ‘gamechanger’ Alzheimer’s drugs ‘trivial’, review concludes The Guardian —
- Analysis of Alzheimer’s Drugs Stirs Debate About Their Effectiveness The New York Times —
- Alzheimer’s drugs ‘make no meaningful difference to patients’, say researchers Belfast Telegraph —
- Alzheimer’s bombshell as top scientists conclude - ‘the drugs don’t work’ Mirror —
- Alzheimer’s drugs ‘make no meaningful difference to patients’, say researchers The Standard —
- Alzheimer's 'wonder drugs' do not work, major study finds despite hopes of end to disease LBC —
- New Alzheimer’s drugs make ‘no meaningful difference’ to patients The Times —
Alzheimer's drugs benefit 'trivial'
The extensive review analyzed data from 17 clinical trials of anti-amyloid drugs, including the licensed medications lecanemab and donanemab.
Researchers found that while the drugs successfully remove amyloid from the brain, they do not result in a meaningful improvement in cognitive function.
Some experts described the review as a 'silly paper' that should not have been published, while others hailed it as a necessary reality check for the medical industry.
The controversy highlights the ongoing debate over the effectiveness and high cost of new dementia treatments.
Alzheimer's Society of Germany
Selbsthilfegruppe
Selbsthilfegruppe
Lecanemab
Monoclonal antibody
Monoclonal antibody
Donanemab
Experimental drug for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease
Experimental drug for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease