- Why Supreme Court oral arguments in birthright citizenship case did not go well for Trump CBS News —
- A President, the Supreme Court and a Landmark Citizenship Order Collide The New York Times —
- In Birthright Case, Trump’s Likely Loss May Not End the Fight The New York Times —
- John C. Calhoun Lives The Atlantic —
- “It’s a New World. It’s the Same Constitution.” Slate —
- One of the Most Famous Trials in U.S. History Disproves Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Case Slate —
- In the Birthright Citizenship Hearing, a Story of Asians Fighting for Rights The New York Times —
- Habitantes de Chicago reaccionan a los argumentos sobre la ciudadanía por nacimiento ante la Corte Suprema Chicago Sun-Times —
- Justice Jackson sparks online uproar after linking birthright citizenship to stealing a wallet in Japan Fox News —
- White House Scrambles to Wipe Trump Meltdown Footage Daily Beast —
Supreme Court Birthright Citizenship Clash
The case represents one of the most significant challenges to executive power in recent history, with the administration arguing that the president has the authority to redefine who is 'subject to the jurisdiction' of the United States.
During the hearing, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and other members of the court's liberal wing highlighted the potential for mass disenfranchisement if the order were upheld.
Even some conservative justices expressed reservations about upending over a century of legal tradition through executive fiat.
A ruling against the administration could deal a major blow to one of the president's central campaign promises.